| 8 Jun 2007 | Emily H. Phifer | Loading...Spiffy, though I agree with above artist that a bit more coral would have been more convincing. But maybe you didn't mean that he summons coral? Maybe he is summoning ~from~ the coral? Shelz Keast replies: "He was meant to be the spirit of the reef; creator of all the creatures on the reef." | |
| 9 Nov 2007 | Lucie Mueller | Loading...actually I'm afraid of sharks and I don't like deep water. It's not that I don't like sharks, I have just a very deep respect of them. But in your pic they look really friendly. and the summoner looks very interesting... cool idea by the way  Shelz Keast replies: "I don't think I was going for 'friendly' per say with the sharks, just nuetral. Sharks are an important part of the reef comunity after all. " | |
| 25 Mar 2008 | Sam Adams | Loading...Awesomes sharks! Is that Gollum?  Shelz Keast replies: "No, not Gollum. It’s supposed to be a coral god or spirit." | |
| 3 Jun 2008 | Michelle C. Osborn | Loading...I love sharks; I want to study them in college. Fascinating creatures, older than god only knows what, perfection! Yay!
From the ocean comes all life, and to the ocean all life will return. Shelz Keast replies: "Indeed, indeed. Sharks were among the first fish in the sea if my memory is right." | |
| 1 Aug 2008 | The puppy | Loading...Coooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool. | |
| 23 Aug 2008 | Sandra van Iersel | Loading...oh, this looks great, I love the way it looks so sketchy and your technique of shading. It really looks awesome
Shelz Keast replies: "Thanks, it sort of a very refined sketch, I just sort of added the details as they came to mind." | |
| 5 Oct 2008 | Christopher M Cosby | Loading...Very primordial | |
| 2 Apr 2009 | Dina Enethea Rapp | Loading...wow, this is cool  surely something out of the ordinary ^^ I really like it (: Shelz Keast replies: "Thank you. " | |
| 24 Apr 2009 | Natalie Adams | Loading...beautiful shark studies! Shelz Keast replies: "Studies imply using references. I’m pretty sure I didn’t use any references in this piece." | |
| 25 Apr 2009 | Natalie Adams | Loading...
sorry, i should have explained a bit more. When i said ’studies’ i didn’t mean to imly that you used references, i just meant that they are excellent drawings of sharks - very realistic......that’s all, i didn’t intend to snub your drawings, or your pride
sorry Shelz Keast replies: "No offence was taken at all. After all it’s quite acceptable to use references (though some people don’t seem to get the difference between ’referencing’ and ’copying&rsquo " | |